Definition: To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Acts 25:16. It’s a really important piece of information about how Jesus and his followers responded to a dramatic situation in Jerusalem. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Situation: Imagine a Roman guard (the “Romans”) had accused a man named Paul – who was a Jewish believer – of a crime. They were going to deliver him to the authorities to be punished. What Jesus and His Followers Did: Jesus and his followers, especially Peter, didn’t immediately rush to judgment. Instead, they did this: They spoke to the Roman guard directly. They asked them to face-to-face with the accused man. This means they needed to have a direct conversation with him. They gave him the opportunity to explain himself. Crucially, they allowed Paul to answer for himself – to explain why he was accused. What it Means - A Focus on Justice and Truth: This verse is about prioritizing truth and justice over quick punishment. It’s saying: Respecting the Process: The Romans weren't going to punish Paul without him having a chance to defend himself. They weren't acting arbitrarily. Fairness: They were giving Paul the opportunity to explain his side of the story, which is essential for a fair trial. It’s about ensuring everyone has a voice and is heard. Why it's Significant: This verse highlights Jesus' teaching about forgiveness and understanding. It emphasizes that God wants us to deal with people fairly and give them a chance to be truthful. It’s about showing compassion while upholding the law (even if that law is complex). In short, this verse shows that Jesus valued truth and justice more than simply punishing someone. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Give a little background on the context of this passage? Discuss its significance in a broader theological understanding?